First, the defendant claims the arrest by Chief Buddy Pool was invalid because it was made outside the territorial limits of the City of Crescent therefore, any evidence resulting from this arrest should not have been admitted into evidence.
#Bob knowlton case trial#
♤ In his first assignment of error the defendant alleges the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion to suppress evidence. He then tried to persuade his companion to return it, but his efforts were rebuffed. The defendant testified that he was unaware that his companion had taken the chain saw, and it was not until they were a mile out of Hennessey that he learned of the saw. A Pioneer chain saw, model number 1073, was recovered from the trunk of the vehicle. Burns, pursuant to a search warrant issued by the Logan County District Court. The following day it was searched in Guthrie by Kingfisher County Undersheriff Charles Lietzke and his deputy, accompanied by Logan County Deputy Sheriffs Bob Lee and J.C. Meanwhile the automobile was impounded in a Guthrie garage. At this point both suspects were turned over to Kingfisher County officials.
Chief Pool had received a call from the Logan County Sheriff to be on the lookout for the defendant's car. Later the same day, the defendant and his companion were arrested while driving through Crescent, Oklahoma, by Buddy Pool, Crescent Chief of Police. ♣ The police were notified by David Perigo, who was an employee of the store and whose testimony generally corroborated that of Kay Meek as to the previously described events. The chain saw in question was a Pioneer, Model No.
#Bob knowlton case license#
Meek observed the men enter a 1968 Oldsmobile automobile with license plate number LS-9615. As they walked toward their car, a gust of wind raised up the overcoat of the other man, exposing a chain saw being carried underneath. Outside the store the defendant and his companion walked at a hurried pace. Meek noticed an empty spot on the display table. In doing so, they passed a display table on which chain saws were placed. When told the muffler was not in stock, they turned and proceeded to leave the store. They asked the saleslady, Kay Meek, about the availability of a Cadillac muffler. On January 22, 1976, the defendant and another man entered the OTASCO store in Hennessey, Oklahoma. ♢ The evidence may be summarized as follows. From this judgment and sentence a timely appeal has
CRF-76-2, of the offense of Larceny of Merchandise From a Retailer, in violation of 21 O.S. ♡ Appellant, Lloyd Knowlton, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court, Kingfisher County, Case No. Windham, Thompson & Windham, Oklahoma City, for appellant. Lloyd Knowlton, appellant, was convicted of the offense of Larceny of Merchandise From a Retailer was sentenced to one (1) year imprisonment, and appeals. An Appeal from the District Court, Kingfisher County J.
0 kommentar(er)
